Zusammenfassung
In dieser Übersicht werden nach einer kurzen Einführung in die rechtlichen Regelungen
der Spendersamenbehandlung in Deutschland die psychosozialen Aspekte der Paare vor
donogener Insemination (DI), der Samenspender, der Kindes- und Familienentwicklung
nach DI, der Aufklärung vs. Nichtaufklärung der Kinder über DI und die Erfahrungen
mit „open-identity donation“ dargestellt. Der Beitrag schließt mit Forderungen bezüglich
öffentlicher Aufklärung zu DI, zukünftiger psychosozialer Forschungsstrategien und
klarerer rechtlicher Regelungen in Deutschland.
Abstract
After a short introduction on the legal basis of donor insemination (DI) in Germany,
a review is given of the psychosocial aspects affecting couples before DI, as well
as the psychosocial aspects relating to sperm donors, to child and family development
after DI, and regarding disclosure vs. non-disclosure of donor insemination to offspring
including experiences with “open-identity donation”. The article ends with demands
regarding information provided to the public on DI, future psychosocial research strategies
and the need for well-defined legal regulations in Germany.
Schlüsselwörter
donogene Insemination - Geheimhaltung - Kinder nach donogener Insemination - Eltern‐Kind‐Beziehungen
- Samenspender
Key words
donor insemination - secrecy - donor insemination offsprings - parent‐child relationship
- sperm donor
Literatur
- 1
Katzorke T.
Entstehung und Entwicklung der Spendersamenbehandlung in Deutschland.
J Reproduktionsmed Endokrinol.
2008;
5
14-20
- 2 Ehebruch in der Retorte. Der Spiegel 1950 45 33
- 3
Gerstel G.
A psychoanalytic view of artificial donor insemination.
Am J Psychother.
1963;
17
64-77
- 4
Berger D M.
Psychological aspects of donor insemination.
Int J Psychiatry Med.
1982;
12
49-57
- 5
Mayer A.
Die heterologe künstliche Insemination in psychologisch-ethischer Sicht.
ÄM.
1959;
11
341-345
- 6 Wischmann T. „Heidelberger Kinderwunsch-Sprechstunde – Psychosomatische Beratungs-
und Betreuungskonzepte für Paare mit unerfülltem Kinderwunsch“. Habilitationsschrift
Medizinische Fakultät. Heidelberg; Universität Heidelberg 2004
- 7
Golombok S, Brewaeys A, Cook R. et al .
The European study of assisted reproduction families: family functioning and child
development.
Hum Reprod.
1996;
11
2324-2331
- 8
van den Akker O BA.
The acceptable face of parenthood: Psychosocial factors of infertility treatment.
Psychology Evolution and Gender.
2001;
3
137-153
- 9
Hahn C-S, DiPietro J A.
In vitro fertilization and the family: Quality of parenting, family functioning, and
child psychosocial adjustment.
Dev Psychol.
2001;
37
37-48
- 10 Brodzinsky D M, Schechter M D, Henig R M. Being adopted: the lifelong search for
self. New York; Bantam Dell Pub Group 1992
- 11
McWhinnie A.
Gamete donation and anonymity. Should offspring from donated gametes continue to be
denied knowledge of their origins and antecedents?.
Hum Reprod.
2001;
16
807-817
- 12
Brandon J, Warner J.
A.I.D. and Adoption: Some Comparisons.
Br J Soc Work.
1977;
7
335-341
- 13
Hammel A, Bispink G, Katzorke T. et al .
Empfehlungen des Arbeitskreises für Donogene Insemination (DI) zur Qualitätssicherung
der Behandlung mit Spendersamen in Deutschland in der Fassung vom 8. Februar 2006.
J Reproduktionsmed Endokrinol.
2006;
3
166-174
- 14
Hoppe J D, Scriba P C.
(Muster-)Richtlinie zur Durchführung der assistierten Reproduktion – Novelle 2006.
Dtsch Ärztebl.
2006;
20
A1392-A1403
- 15
Thorn P, Wischmann T.
Leitlinien für die psychosoziale Beratung bei Gametenspende.
J Reproduktionsmed Endokrinol.
2008;
3
147-152
- 16
Thorn P, Wischmann T.
Eine kritische Würdigung der Novellierung der (Muster-)Richtlinie der Bundesärztekammer
2006 aus der Perspektive der psychosozialen Beratung.
J Reproduktionsmed Endokrinol.
2008;
5
39-44
- 17 Davies-Osterkamp S.
Psychologische Untersuchungen im Rahmen künstlicher Befruchtungstechniken. Brähler E, Meyer A, Hrsg. Psychologische Probleme in der Reproduktionsmedizin. Jahrbuch
der Medizinischen Psychologie, Band 5. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York; Springer 1991:
15-35
- 18
Klock S C, Maier D.
Psychological factors related to donor insemination.
Fertil Steril.
1991;
3
489-495
- 19 Strauß B. Psychosomatik der Sterilität und der Sterilitätsbehandlung. Stuttgart;
Enke 1991
- 20
Schover L, Collins R L, Richards S.
Psychological aspects of donor insemination: evaluation and follow-up of recipient
couples.
Fertil Steril.
1992;
57
583-590
- 21
Glover L, Gannon K, Sherr L. et al .
Distress in sub-fertile men: a longitudinal study.
J Reproduct Infant Psychol.
1996;
14
23-36
- 22
Lui S C, Weaver S M, Robinson J. et al .
A survey of semen donor attitudes.
Hum Reprod.
1995;
10
234-238
- 23
Schover L R, Rothmann S A, Collins R L.
The personality and motivation of semen donors: a comparison with oocyte donors.
Hum Reprod.
1992;
7
575-579
- 24
Daniels K, Lalos O.
Ethics and Society: The Swedish insemination act and the availability of donors.
Hum Reprod.
1995;
10
1871-1874
- 25
Lalos A, Daniels K, Gottlieb C. et al .
Recruitment and motivation of semen providers in Sweden.
Hum Reprod.
2003;
18
212-216
- 26 Barratt C LR.
Donor recruitment, selection and screening. Barratt CLR, Cooke ID, eds. Donor insemination. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press
1993: 3-11
- 27
Bendvold E, Skjaeraasen J, Moe N. et al .
Marital break-up among couples raising families by artificial insemination by donor.
Fertil Steril.
1989;
51
980-983
- 40
Amuzu B, Laxova R, Shapiro S S.
Pregnancy outcome, health of children, and family adjustment after donor insemination.
Obstet Gynecol.
1990;
75
899-905
- 28
Lycett E, Daniels K, Curson R. et al .
Offspring created as a result of donor insemination: a study of family relationships,
child adjustment, and disclosure.
Fertil Steril.
2004;
82
172-179
- 29
Golombok S, Brewaeys A, Giavazzi M T. et al .
The European study of assisted reproduction families: the transition to adolescence.
Hum Reprod.
2002;
17
830-840
- 30
Golombok S, MacCullum F, Goodman E. et al .
Families with children conceived by donor insemination: A follow-up at age twelve.
Child Develop.
2002;
73
952-968
- 31
Wischmann T.
Psychosoziale Entwicklung von IVF-Kindern und ‐Eltern.
J Reproduktionsmed Endokrinol.
2008;
6
329-334
- 32
Golombok S, Perry B, Burston A. et al .
Children with lesbian parents: A community study.
Develop Psychol.
2003;
39
20-33
- 33
Scheib J E, Riordan M, Rubin S.
Choosing identity-release sperm donors: the parents' perspective 13–18 years later.
Hum Reprod.
2003;
18
1115-1127
- 34
Vanfraussen K, Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I, Brewaeys A.
Family functioning in lesbian families created by donor insemination.
Am J Orthopsychiatry.
2003;
73
78-90
- 35
Bos H MW, van Balen F, van den Boom D C.
Experience of parenthood, couple relationship, social support, and child-rearing goals
in planned lesbian mother families.
J Child Psychol Psychiatr.
2004;
45
755-764
- 36
Murray C, Golombok S.
Solo mothers and their donor insemination infants: follow-up at age 2 years.
Hum Reprod.
2005;
20
1655-1660
- 37 Thorn P.
Eine Familie … ist eine Familie … ist eine Familie?. Kleinschmidt D, Thorn P, Wischmann T, Hrsg. Kinderwunsch und professionelle Beratung.
Das Handbuch des Beratungsnetzwerkes Kinderwunsch Deutschland (BKiD). Stuttgart; Kohlhammer
2008: 99-105
- 38
Nachtigall R D.
Secrecy: An unresolved issue in the practice of donor insemination.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
1993;
168
1846-1851
- 39
Brewaeys A.
Review: parent-child relationships and child development in donor insemination families.
Hum Reprod Update.
2001;
7
38-46
- 41
Brewaeys A.
Donor insemination, the impact on family and child development.
J Psychosom Obst Gyn.
1996;
17
1-13
- 42
Cook R, Golombok S, Bish A. et al .
Disclosure of donor insemination: Parental attitudes.
Am J Orthopsychiatry.
1995;
65
549-559
- 43 Manuel C, Chevret M, Cyzba J.
Handling the secrecy by AID couples. David G, Price E, eds. Human artificial insemination and semen preservation. New
York; Plenum Press 1980: 419-430
- 44
Rowland R.
The social and psychological consequences of secrecy in artificial insemination by
donor (AID) programmes.
Soc Sci Med.
1985;
21
391-396
- 45
Schilling G.
Zur Problematik familiärer Geheimnisse am Beispiel der heterologen Insemination.
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol.
1995;
45
16-23
- 46 Zoldbrod A P, Covington S H.
Recipient counseling for donor insemination. Burns LH, Covington SH, eds. Infertility counseling. A comprehensive handbook for
clinicans. New York, London; Parthenon Publishing 1999: 325-344
- 47
Thorn P, Daniels K.
Pro und Contra Kindesaufklärung nach donogener Insemination – Neuere Entwicklungen
und Ergebnisse einer explorativen Studie.
Geburtsh Frauenheilk.
2007;
67
993-1001
- 48
Daniels K R, Lewis G M, Gillett W.
Telling donor insemination offspring about their conception: The nature of couples'
decision-making.
Soc Sci Med.
1995;
40
1213-1220
- 49
Brewaeys A, de Bruyn J K, Louwe L A. et al .
Anonymous or identity-registered sperm donors? A study of Dutch recipients' choices.
Hum Reprod.
2005;
20
820-824
- 50
Turner A J, Coyle A.
What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived
by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapy.
Hum Reprod.
2000;
15
2041-2051
- 51
Anonymous.
How it feels to be a child of donor insemination.
BMJ.
2002;
324
797
- 52
Skoog Svanberg A, Sydsjö G, Ekholm Selling K. et al .
Attitudes towards gamete donation among Swedish gynaecologists and obstetricians.
Hum Reprod.
2008;
23
904-911
- 53
Blyth E, Frith L.
The UK's gamete donor 'crisis' – a critical analysis.
Critical Social Policy.
2008;
28
74-95
- 54
Thorn P, Katzorke T, Daniels K.
Semen donors in Germany: A study exploring motivations and attitudes.
Hum Reprod.
2008;
23
2415-2420
- 55
Greenfeld D A.
Changing attitudes towards third-party reproductive techniques.
Curr Opinion Obstet Gynecol.
2002;
14
289-292
- 56
Scheib J E, Cushing R.
Open-identity donor insemination in the United States: is it on the rise?.
Fertil Steril.
2007;
88
231-232
- 57
Scheib J E, Riordan M, Rubin S.
Adolescents with open-identity sperm donors: reports from 12–17 year olds.
Hum Reprod.
2005;
20
239-252
- 58
Gottlieb C, Lalos O, Lindblad F.
Disclosure of donor insemination to the child: the impact of Swedish legislation on
couples' attitudes.
Hum Reprod.
2000;
15
2052-2056
- 59
Lindblad F, Gottlieb C, Lalos O.
To tell or not to tell – what parents think about telling their children that they
were born following donor insemination.
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol.
2000;
21
193-203
- 60
Lalos A, Gottlieb C, Lalos O.
Legislated right for donor-insemination children to know their genetic origin: a study
of parental thinking.
Hum Reprod.
2007;
22
1759-1768
- 61
Daniels K.
Donor gametes: anonymous or identified?.
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol.
2007;
21
113-128
- 62
Katzorke T.
Donogene Insemination.
Gynäkologe.
2007;
10
807-812
- 63
Nyboe Andersen A, Goossens V, Ferraretti A P. et al .
Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2004: results generated from European
registers by ESHRE.
Hum Reprod.
2008;
23
756-771
- 64
Goverde A, McDonnell J, Vermeiden J. et al .
Intrauterine insemination or in-vitro fertilisation in idiopathic subfertility and
male subfertility: a randomised trial and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Lancet.
2000;
355
13-18
- 65
Nuojua-Huttunen S, Tomas C, Bloigu R. et al .
Intrauterine insemination treatment in subfertility: an analysis of factors affecting
outcome.
Hum Reprod.
1999;
14
698-703
- 66 Thorn P. Die Geschichte unserer Familie. Ein Buch für Familien, die sich mit Hilfe
der Spendersamenbehandlung gebildet haben. Mörfelden; FamART Verlag 2006
- 67 Thorn P. Familiengründung mit Samenspende. Ein Ratgeber zu psychosozialen und rechtlichen
Fragen. Stuttgart; Kohlhammer 2008
- 68 Daniels K. Building a family with the assistance of donor insemination. Wellington;
Dunmore Publishing 2004
- 69 Kirkman M, Rosenthal D, Johnson L. Telling it your way: A guide for parents of
donor-conveived adolescents. Melbourne; Infertility Treatmend Authority Victoria 2007
- 70 Montuschi O. ‘Telling’ and talking about donor conception for 0–7 year olds: A
guide for parents. Nottingham; Donor Conception Network 2006
Priv.-Doz. Dr., Dipl.-Psych. Tewes Wischmann
Zentrum für Psychosoziale Medizin
Institut für Medizinische Psychologie
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
Bergheimer Straße 20
69115 Heidelberg
Email: tewes.wischmann@med.uni-heidelberg.de
